• Welcome to the Online Discussion Groups, Guest.

    Please introduce yourself here. We'd love to hear from you!

    If you are a CompTIA member you can find your regional community here and get posting.

    This notification is dismissable and will disappear once you've made a couple of posts.
  • We will be shutting down for a brief period of time on 9/24 at around 8 AM CST to perform necessary software updates and maintenance; please plan accordingly!

Brianna White

Administrator
Staff member
Jul 30, 2019
4,655
3,454
For more than a decade, women have earned more doctoral degrees than men in the United States. Despite that, women still lag behind men in getting tenure, getting published and reaching leadership positions in academia.
Much of the research into why that might be focuses on structural barriers and explicit prejudice. But a new study by a team of researchers at Stanford Graduate School of Education (GSE) finds a widespread implicit bias against academic work that simply seems feminine—even if it's not about women or gender specifically.
Analyzing nearly 1 million doctoral dissertations from U.S. universities over a recent 40-year period, the researchers found that scholars who wrote about topics associated with women, or used methodologies associated with women, were less likely to go on to get senior faculty positions than those who did not.
The issue wasn't so much a prejudice against feminist studies or gender studies, which have expanded considerably since the 1970s. In fact, people who wrote their dissertations explicitly about women had slightly better career prospects than those who wrote explicitly about men.
Continue reading: https://phys.org/news/2021-12-reveals-hidden-obstacle-women-academia.html
 

Attachments

  • p0006238.m05896.1_womanprofess.jpg
    p0006238.m05896.1_womanprofess.jpg
    33.6 KB · Views: 43
  • Like
Reactions: Brianna White